United States Postal Service®

Quarterly Performance for Standard Mail®
Mailpieces Delivered Between 07/01/2016 and 09/30/2016

Quarter IV
FY2016

Overview

For Standard Mail® letters and non-Saturation flats, the service performance measurement system of the Postal Service™ uses documented arrival time at a designated postal facility to start the measurement clock, and an Intelligent Mail® barcode (IMb™) scan by an external, third-party reporter to stop-the-clock. Mail piece tracking from IMb™ in-process scans is used in conjunction with the external data to extrapolate results for the population of Standard Mail® using Full-Service Intelligent Mail®. Data collected by the Postal Service™ are provided to an independent, external contractor to calculate service measurement and compile the necessary reports. The system used for this reporting is called the Intelligent Mail® Accuracy and Performance System (iMAPS).

The external contractor determines service performance based on the elapsed time between the start-the-clock event recorded by the Postal Service™ and the stop-the-clock event recorded by anonymous households and small businesses that report delivery information directly to the contractor. The service measure consists of two parts: (1) how long mail pieces take to get through processing, and (2) how long mail takes from the last processing scan to delivery. The second portion is used as a delivery factor differential to determine the percent of all Standard Mail® delivered on the last processing date versus the percent delivered after the last processing date. Service performance is measured by comparing the transit time to USPS® service standards to determine the percent of mail delivered on time.

The Service Performance Measurement (SPM) application of the Full-Service Seamless Acceptance and Service Performance system (SASP) serves as the data source for iMAPS. SPM captures data from all Full-Service Intelligent Mail® and applies business rules for service measurement before sending data to iMAPS.

The service performance measure for DDU-entry Saturation flats involves the identification of major weekly Saturation mailings within delivery units. Delivery of these mailings is captured with a scan made by carriers at the completion of delivery of all pieces on the route. Service performance is measured by comparing the delivery date to the end date of the mailer requested in-home window to determine the percent delivered on time. Data from anonymous households reporting the receipt of these Saturation mailings are used to validate the accuracy of the carrier scans.

The service performance measurement system for Every Door Direct Mail (EDDM) - Retail™ uses the documented arrival time of a mailing at a retail unit to start the clock, using the point-of-sale scan when mail is handed to the Postal Service™, and an Intelligent Mail® parcel barcode (IMpb™) scan by a USPS® carrier to stop the clock. The delivery of bundles of EDDM-Retail™ pieces is captured with a scan made by carriers at the delivery unit upon distribution for delivery. Service performance is measured by comparing the total transit time of mailpiece bundles to the service standard to determine the percent delivered on time.

Results for DDU-entry Saturation flats and EDDM-Retail™ are combined with other destination entry Standard Mail in the Destination Entry scores in this report.

The service performance measure for Standard Mail® parcels with USPS Tracking™ serves as a proxy for measuring service performance for Standard Mail® parcels.

Limitations

Due to limited automated processing for Standard Mail® flats, the service performance results may not be representative of all Standard Mail® flats performance. While Destination Delivery Unit (DDU) entered Saturation flats and EDDM - Retail™ flats have been included this quarter, significant gaps in the coverage of non-Saturation/non- EDDM - Retail™ DDU-entry mail still remain and are excluded from the measurement.

Results for Standard Mail® parcels, which represent less than 0.1 percent of all Standard Mail®, are not included in the overall Standard Mail® results.

The delivery factor for Standard Mail® Letters was created using Standard Mail® Letters with Intelligent Mail® barcodes received by external reporters. Data for the delivery factor of Standard Mail® Flats were based on a combination of Standard Mail® Flats and Bound Printed Matter Flats with Intelligent Mail® barcodes as well as EXFC test flats received by external reporters. The EXFC and Bound Printed Matter Flats data were used to supplement the limited Standard Mail® Flats data available during this period.

Performance Highlights

National Destination Entry mail achieved performance of 95.0 percent on time in Q4, 4.0 points higher when compared to the same period last year, and 99.6 percent delivered within service standard plus three days. The Honolulu Performance Cluster led the nation in Destination Entry performance with 99.1 percent on time. Sixty-Two districts achieved an on-time performance at or above the performance target of 91.0 for Destination Entry mail.

End-to-End entry National performance was 73.0 percent on time in Q4, 13.7 points higher when compared to the same period last year. In FY16 Q4, 94.7 percent of End-to-End entry standard mail was delivered within the service standard plus three days. The Alaska District had the highest End-To-End entry score with 93.4 percent on time.

FY16 annual national scores increased compared to FY15, with Destination Entry performance improving by 3.2 points and End-to-End increasing by 6.3 points, scoring at 92.3 and 65.9, respectively. The FY 16 annual score for Destination entry exceeded the target of 91.0 and represented the highest annual score since measurement began.

 

District Destination Entry End-to-End
Percent On Time Percent On Time
Capital Metro Area 95.5 69.0
Atlanta 95.4 68.3
Baltimore 95.1 65.3
Capital 94.6 66.4
Greater South Carolina 93.5 72.8
Greensboro 94.9 79.8
Mid-Carolinas 95.6 77.4
Northern Virginia 95.9 55.5
Richmond 96.2 66.3
Eastern Area 96.5 72.9
Appalachian 96.8 67.6
Central Pennsylvania 97.0 66.4
Kentuckiana 96.3 67.9
Northern Ohio 96.2 77.1
Ohio Valley 95.7 71.1
Philadelphia Metro 95.7 68.1
South Jersey 97.0 69.6
Tennessee 96.3 77.4
Western New York 97.0 74.7
Western Pennsylvania 97.2 85.8
Great Lakes Area 93.0 69.0
Central Illinois 89.5 66.8
Chicago 90.6 64.3
Detroit 89.6 72.8
Gateway 95.5 76.5
Greater Indiana 94.4 65.3
Greater Michigan 96.4 67.8
Lakeland 94.5 66.0
Northeast Area 92.2 59.7
Albany 91.8 58.7
Caribbean 95.6 71.5
Connecticut Valley 92.0 60.0
Greater Boston 92.0 57.3
Long Island 94.1 58.5
New York 90.8 61.5
Northern New England 94.7 56.7
Northern New Jersey 92.9 58.5
Triboro 91.1 69.3
Westchester 90.5 60.1
Pacific Area 95.4 75.0
Bay-Valley 95.7 77.5
Honolulu 99.1 84.6
Los Angeles 92.0 69.4
Sacramento 95.3 74.0
San Diego 96.2 75.6
San Francisco 95.9 69.5
Santa Ana 96.0 74.0
Sierra Coastal 96.3 77.6
Southern Area 95.0 78.3
Alabama 96.0 72.2
Arkansas 96.6 72.4
Dallas 94.0 71.6
Fort Worth 96.7 75.2
Gulf Atlantic 95.9 80.6
Houston 93.7 86.7
Louisiana 94.4 76.4
Mississippi 94.4 77.0
Oklahoma 96.3 77.4
Rio Grande 96.7 75.2
South Florida 92.0 78.4
Suncoast 95.7 81.8
Western Area 96.3 78.3
Alaska 97.3 93.4
Arizona 97.0 76.2
Central Plains 96.5 77.4
Colorado/Wyoming 93.2 70.5
Dakotas 96.0 70.6
Hawkeye 96.6 76.6
Mid-America 96.8 78.6
Nevada-Sierra 97.9 84.2
Northland 96.8 77.8
Portland 97.2 74.3
Salt Lake City 97.0 78.1
Seattle 96.5 85.1
Nation FY2016 Q4 95.0 73.0

Nation FY2015 Q4 (SPLY) 91.0 59.3

Nation FY2009 Annual 86.4 70.7
Nation FY2010 Annual 83.4 59.0
Nation FY2011 Annual 70.3 38.4
Nation FY2012 Annual 82.0 56.5
Nation FY2013 Annual 88.8 63.3
Nation FY2014 Annual 89.9 63.5
Nation FY2015 Annual 89.1 59.6
Nation FY2016 Annual 92.3 65.9
Nation FY2016 Q1 88.4 58.4
Nation FY2016 Q2 91.5 62.0
Nation FY2016 Q3 95.2 71.3

FY2016 Annual Target 91.0 91.0