United States Postal Service®

Quarterly Performance for Standard Mail®
Mailpieces Delivered Between 01/01/2016 and 03/31/2016

Quarter II
FY2016

Overview

For Standard Mail® letters and non-Saturation flats, the service performance measurement system of the Postal Service™ uses documented arrival time at a designated postal facility to start the measurement clock, and an Intelligent Mail® barcode (IMb™) scan by an external, third-party reporter to stop-the-clock. Mail piece tracking from IMb™ in-process scans is used in conjunction with the external data to extrapolate results for the population of Standard Mail® using Full-Service Intelligent Mail®. Data collected by the Postal Service™ are provided to an independent, external contractor to calculate service measurement and compile the necessary reports. The system used for this reporting is called the Intelligent Mail® Accuracy and Performance System (iMAPS).

The external contractor determines service performance based on the elapsed time between the start-the-clock event recorded by the Postal Service™ and the stop-the-clock event recorded by anonymous households and small businesses that report delivery information directly to the contractor. The service measure consists of two parts: (1) how long mail pieces take to get through processing, and (2) how long mail takes from the last processing scan to delivery. The second portion is used as a delivery factor differential to determine the percent of all Standard Mail® delivered on the last processing date versus the percent delivered after the last processing date. Service performance is measured by comparing the transit time to USPS® service standards to determine the percent of mail delivered on time.

The Service Performance Measurement (SPM) application of the Full-Service Seamless Acceptance and Service Performance system (SASP) serves as the data source for iMAPS. SPM captures data from all Full-Service Intelligent Mail® and applies business rules for service measurement before sending data to iMAPS.

he service performance measure for DDU-entry Saturation flats involves the identification of major weekly Saturation mailings within delivery units. Delivery of these mailings is captured with a scan made by carriers at the completion of delivery of all pieces on the route. Service performance is measured by comparing the delivery date to the end date of the mailer requested in-home window to determine the percent delivered on time. Data from anonymous households reporting the receipt of these Saturation mailings are used to validate the accuracy of the carrier scans.

The service performance measurement system for Every Door Direct Mail (EDDM) - Retail™ uses the documented arrival time of a mailing at a retail unit to start the clock, using the point-of-sale scan when mail is handed to the Postal Service™, and an Intelligent Mail® parcel barcode (IMpb™) scan by a USPS® carrier to stop the clock. The delivery of bundles of EDDM-Retail™ pieces is captured with a scan made by carriers at the delivery unit upon distribution for delivery. Service performance is measured by comparing the total transit time of mailpiece bundles to the service standard to determine the percent delivered on time.

Results for DDU-entry Saturation flats and EDDM-Retail™ are combined with other destination entry Standard Mail in the Destination Entry scores in this report.

The service performance measure for Standard Mail® parcels with USPS Tracking™ serves as a proxy for measuring service performance for Standard Mail® parcels.

Limitations

Due to limited automated processing for Standard Mail® flats, the service performance results may not be representative of all Standard Mail® flats performance. While Destination Delivery Unit (DDU) entered Saturation flats and EDDM - Retail™ flats have been included this quarter, significant gaps in the coverage of non-Saturation/non- EDDM - Retail™ DDU-entry mail still remain and are excluded from the measurement.

Results for Standard Mail® parcels, which represent less than 0.1 percent of all Standard Mail®, are not included in the overall Standard Mail® results.

The delivery factor for Standard Mail® Letters was created using Standard Mail® Letters with Intelligent Mail® barcodes received by external reporters. Data for the delivery factor of Standard Mail® Flats were based on a combination of Standard Mail® Flats and Bound Printed Matter Flats with Intelligent Mail® barcodes as well as EXFC test flats received by external reporters. The EXFC and Bound Printed Matter Flats data were used to supplement the limited Standard Mail® Flats data available during this period.

Performance Highlights

National Destination Entry mail achieved performance of 91.5 percent on time in Q2, 5.8 points higher when compared to the same period last year, and 99.2 percent delivered within service standard plus three days. The Honolulu Performance Cluster led the nation in Destination Entry performance with 97.7 percent on time. Forty-Eight districts achieved an on time performance at or above the performance target of 91.0 for Destination Entry mail.

End-to-End entry National performance was 62.0 percent on time, 7.5 points higher when compared to the same period last year. In FY16 Q2, 89.5 percent of End-to-End entry standard mail was delivered within the service standard plus three days. The Alaska District had the highest End-To-End entry score with 86.3 percent on time.

 

District Destination Entry End-to-End
Percent On Time Percent On Time
Capital Metro Area 88.4 55.1
Atlanta 91.8 55.5
Baltimore 81.4 50.4
Capital 80.7 46.1
Greater South Carolina 92.6 62.6
Greensboro 90.6 58.8
Mid-Carolinas 92.3 65.0
Northern Virginia 87.6 50.3
Richmond 87.3 48.3
Eastern Area 94.4 63.6
Appalachian 95.3 54.8
Central Pennsylvania 95.6 54.4
Kentuckiana 94.2 62.1
Northern Ohio 95.0 70.4
Ohio Valley 94.0 65.0
Philadelphia Metro 91.5 55.1
South Jersey 94.5 55.1
Tennessee 93.0 66.5
Western New York 96.3 63.2
Western Pennsylvania 96.7 78.1
Great Lakes Area 90.7 59.8
Central Illinois 92.5 56.1
Chicago 70.6 51.6
Detroit 88.4 58.1
Gateway 93.8 64.9
Greater Indiana 92.3 60.2
Greater Michigan 95.1 55.8
Lakeland 92.3 61.1
Northeast Area 89.9 49.9
Albany 92.5 53.2
Caribbean 94.7 63.6
Connecticut Valley 92.4 53.8
Greater Boston 90.6 52.3
Long Island 91.8 42.7
New York 84.4 53.9
Northern New England 93.0 47.5
Northern New Jersey 89.1 45.1
Triboro 81.6 55.1
Westchester 91.4 51.3
Pacific Area 92.2 62.3
Bay-Valley 93.8 64.0
Honolulu 97.7 65.2
Los Angeles 84.8 55.5
Sacramento 91.0 62.8
San Diego 92.8 61.2
San Francisco 93.0 58.1
Santa Ana 93.1 64.0
Sierra Coastal 95.6 68.7
Southern Area 91.8 67.0
Alabama 94.9 63.1
Arkansas 95.0 64.8
Dallas 88.4 56.6
Fort Worth 93.3 69.3
Gulf Atlantic 93.1 66.8
Houston 89.2 76.4
Louisiana 90.0 68.8
Mississippi 94.4 65.1
Oklahoma 95.4 66.5
Rio Grande 95.1 65.5
South Florida 89.4 70.6
Suncoast 91.5 67.6
Western Area 91.7 67.0
Alaska 93.8 86.3
Arizona 92.1 62.0
Central Plains 90.9 66.6
Colorado/Wyoming 84.4 58.7
Dakotas 94.4 60.1
Hawkeye 92.2 69.4
Mid-America 95.5 74.3
Nevada-Sierra 93.9 68.4
Northland 89.2 64.1
Portland 95.7 65.5
Salt Lake City 93.9 64.6
Seattle 92.7 75.9
Nation FY2016 Q2 91.5 62.0

Nation FY2015 Q2 (SPLY) 85.7 54.5

Nation FY2009 Annual 86.4 70.7
Nation FY2010 Annual 83.4 59.0
Nation FY2011 Annual 70.3 38.4
Nation FY2012 Annual 82.0 56.5
Nation FY2013 Annual 88.8 63.3
Nation FY2014 Annual 89.9 63.5
Nation FY2015 Annual 89.1 59.6
Nation FY2016 Q1 88.4 58.4

FY2016 Annual Target 91.0 91.0