PUBLICITY KIT
In April of 2001, the General Accounting Office (GAO)
placed the U.S. Postal Service on its high-risk list. In its report, the GAO stated that the Postal Service's basic business model, in which rising mail volume is intended to
cover rising costs and lessen rate increases, is increasingly
problematic as mail volume declines. The report goes on to
say that the current framework of legal requirements and
practical constraints hinders the Postal Service's ability to
guarantee its own financial viability.
The GAO called on the Postal Service to develop a comprehensive Transformation Plan, in conjunction with Congress and other stakeholders, that would identify actions
needed to address its financial, operational, and human
capital challenges. The Postal Service submitted just such
a plan on April 4, 2002.
The Postal Service lost $1.68 billion in fiscal year 2001
and could lose that much again in 2002. We lack income to
fund increased expenses for safety, maintenance, expansion, and modernization. Our ability to fund present and
future debts is also at risk, and our statutory debt limit of
$15 billion could soon be reached.
We will focus on financial, operational, and human capital challenges that can be done quickly, through changes in
our own way of doing things. Such actions would require
little or no regulatory changes. Examples would include reducing operating costs, moving repetitive administrative
work to shared services, working with the Postal Rate Commission (PRC) to enhance pricing flexibility, and refining
our retail network. We plan to cut $5 billion in costs (on an
annualized basis) over the next 5 years.
In the Transformation Plan, we recommend changing
our business model. The new model is called a Commercial
Government Enterprise (CGE) and would require legislative changes from Congress. A CGE is owned by the
government but structured and operated in a much more
businesslike manner with attributes appropriate to the
unique role the Postal Service plays in the nation. The CGE
model offers the potential for greater flexibility in pricing,
operations, and human resources while still maintain-
ing our universal service obligation and public service
commitment.
Congress will hold hearings on the Transformation Plan
this spring. Several members of Congress have already expressed their desire to see the Postal Service operate under a new business model. The importance of the mail to
our nation's economy was never more evident than during
the events after September 11. Congress, the mailing industry, and our own leadership all agree that the time to act
is now. We have never had a better opportunity to realize
postal reform. This Transformation Plan will begin that
process.
The Postal Service is the second largest civilian employer in the United States (Wal-Mart is first) with
more than 750,000 employees.
In 2001, the Postal Service delivered 207 billion
pieces of letter mail, periodicals, advertising mail,
and packages to 138 million addresses 6 days a
week.
The Postal Service delivers 46 percent of the world's
mail volume.
In 1 week, the Postal Service delivers the same volume as United Parcel Service delivers in 1 year. In 2
days the Postal Service delivers the equivalent of
Federal Express' annual volume.
Current Postal Service System:
The 1970 Postal Reorganization Act (PRA) changed the
Post Office Department to the current Postal Service. For
the past 30 years, that legislation has served the nation
well. It has allowed the Postal Service to maintain universal
mail service, improve service quality, and keep rate increases level with inflation. All while delivering 207 billion
pieces of letter mail, periodicals, advertising mail, and
packages to 138 million addresses per year.
Changing Environment:
However, sweeping changes in technology and business practices have caused a vastly different commercial
environment from 1970. Growth in mail volume has declined every year since 1997. In fact, total volume of mail
decreased in 2001. And the Postal Service saw its largest
mail volume decline in the first half of fiscal year 2002 since
the Great Depression.
Next Steps for the Future:
In April 2001, the GAO placed the Postal Service's
transformation efforts on its high-risk list to focus attention
on challenges facing the organization. In June 2001, Congress asked the postmaster general to prepare a plan that
would address the structural reform of the organization.
The Postal Service published the Outline for Discussion:
Concepts for Postal Transformation on September 30,
2001, which established the framework for a comprehensive discussion among Postal Service stakeholders.
Near-term regulatory and legislative reforms will help to
stabilize the Postal Service's financial base until more permanent legislative solutions are developed.
Long-term solutions include changing business models
and becoming a CGE. The CGE model will give the Postal
Service the flexibility to survive in the modern marketplace
and fulfill its mission of universal service.
The Postal Service lacks income to meet increased expenses for safety, maintenance, expansion, and modernization as well as to fund its present and future debts. The
statutory debt limit of $15 billion will soon be reached without extensive changes. To focus on these financial challenges, the Postal Service will feature both near- and
long-term changes.
Near term:
Some near-term changes outlined in the plan include
Reducing Post Office costs by consolidating and outsourcing administrative work and introducing new
techniques.
Enhancing pricing flexibility by working with the PRC
to create predictable price changes.
Lifting the moratorium on Post Office closings.
Some other changes include
New postal laws for pricing flexibility and funding.
A new regulatory model that replaces the 1970 model
and redefines the nature of the Postal Service for the
next 20 to 30 years.
To read the full Transformation Plan, go to
www.usps.com.
Category
|
Ecomomic Impact
|
Employees
|
883,645*
|
Wages
|
$35,838,293,258*
|
Federal Taxes
|
$4,784,160,048*
|
State Taxes
|
$1,179,748,882*
|
Facilities
|
44,571**
|
Owned
|
10,791**
|
Leased
|
33,780**
|
Annual USPS Lease Payments
|
$984,765,303**
|
Supply and Services
|
2001 Contracts Awarded
|
9,446***
|
Value (2001 Contracts)
|
$2,113,972,908***
|
Ongoing Contracts
|
25,360
|
Value (Ongoing Contracts)
|
$15,729,802,130
|
Highway Contractor Route Segments
|
Number of Segments
|
17,534***
|
Cumulative Annual Rate
|
$2,127,985,250***
|
IMPAC (Visa) Card Charges
|
FY 2001 Cumulative Expenditures
|
$313,825,739***
|
* Dec 2001 Calendar Figures: Include all career and noncareer
employees.
** As of 01/2002.
*** 2001 Fiscal Year Figures: Sept 00-Sept 01.
The volume of mail received per person has risen
nearly 80 percent since the Postal Service was
created in 1970. In 1971, the Postal Service delivered 87 billion pieces of mail and in 2001 delivered
207 billion pieces of mail.
The hub of a $900 billion mailing industry, the Postal
Service faces fierce and growing competition in almost every category of mail.
Each day the Postal Service delivers nearly 700 million pieces of mail to 138 million business and residential addresses, including 19 million Post Office
boxes.
Each day the Postal Service serves 7 million customers at 38,000 postal retail outlets across the country
and collects mail from more than 344,000 street mail-
collection boxes.
Each mail carrier delivers an average of 2,300 pieces
of mail per day on routes that average over 500
addresses.
The Postal Service carries 46 percent of the world's
card and letter mail volume - more mail than any
other country in the world.
Every year the Postal Service adds nearly 1.7 million
new s and businesses to its delivery network
and processes more than 44 million change-of-address forms.
The Postal Service is the second largest civilian employer in the nation (second only to Wal-Mart), employing more than 750,000 workers.
With annual revenues exceeding $66 billion, the
Postal Service would rank 11th in the Fortune 500 if it
were a private company.
The Postal Service helped develop and subsidize every new mode of transportation in this country for the
last 2 centuries and now operates a transport and delivery fleet of 215,000 vehicles, covering 1.1 billion
miles per year.
Postmaster General Jack Potter delivered the Transformation Plan to Congress on April 4. The next day he unveiled the plan at the National Press Club. Here are some
tips to publicize the Transformation Plan locally:
Contact key media representatives
and discuss the Postal Service's impact on the local market. Explain why transformation
is necessary to preserve universal mail service. Work with local Public Affairs
and Communications personnel. See contact list on page 26.
Submit follow-up letters to the editor to newspapers
that run unfavorable stories. Work with local Public
Affairs and Communications personnel.
Schedule meetings with local rotary clubs, civic
groups, etc. to discuss the Transformation Plan.
Identify speaking opportunities
where the Postal Service's transformation message can be presented to local
markets. Use speech on page 18.
As we move along with our Transformation Plan communications rollout, we have identified two additional platforms that each postmaster can use to keep the message
alive. They are the first day of issue for our Heroes of 2001
semipostal stamp and the kick-off of the 2002 Tour de
France.
The Heroes of 2001 semipostal stamp will go on sale
sometime later this spring. The issuance of this stamp will
be a highly visible event in Post Offices across the country.
We will publish a publicity kit in the Postal Bulletin several
weeks prior to the stamp's going on sale to help you plan
and execute meaningful events. Although the main message will be our salute to heroes, the events will afford you
an opportunity to talk about transformation with civic and
legislative leaders who will be in attendance.
In June, each district will once again be asked to host a
USPS Pro Cycling Team flag-raising ceremony to draw
attention to Lance Armstrong's attempt to win his fourth
straight Tour de France. We will send event-planning packages to each district in May. The package will include publicity ideas, a flag autographed by the entire team, 200
USPS Pro Cycling Team lapel pins, and an official team
jersey. The jersey will be presented to an important customer or civic leader as you declare them an "honorary" member of the USPS Pro Cycling Team. The flag-raising event
will serve as a platform for talking about our Transformation
Plan.
SPEECH TO LOCAL ORGANIZATION
Remarks by [POSTMASTER NAME] [LOCATION]
[DATE], 2002
Thank you, [NAME], for that kind introduction.
And thank you for inviting me to speak with you today. It is always a pleasure to talk with friends
and neighbors about something I have committed so much time to - the U.S. Postal Service.
Specifically, what I'd like to talk to you about is the transformation of our Postal Service, from the
top to the bottom. We have a proud 225-year tradition of serving America, at America's front door -
no matter where that front door may be. We want to keep delivering in that tradition.
But these are not traditional times. Let's face facts. The 32-year-old law that created today's Postal Service no longer gives us the ability to effectively adapt to today's rapidly evolving, hi-tech
marketplace.
That is what the Transformation Plan we presented to Congress on April 4 is all about. It's a blueprint for modernizing every aspect of the way we do business.
It will help us secure the future of universal mail service at affordable rates and give us the tools to
protect regular mail and ensure a sound national system for years to come.
If we don't accomplish transformation now, the universal mail service our nation depends on will
be in jeopardy. If we fail to transform ourselves, if we are unable to make the changes needed to
compete successfully, the only Post Offices our children's children will know will be the ones they'll
see in museums.
(PAUSE)
The fact is, the Postal Service of 2002 - and hard-copy mail in general - is still relevant, even in
this technological age. We have worked very hard to make sure that this remains the case. Thanks
to the dedication of neighborhood Postal Service employees here and across the nation, we remain
a vital link among individuals, families, and friends, and we remain a key driver of American commerce.
Of course, we face some obstacles - big ones. Right now, for instance, we're locked into an inflexible pricing system that doesn't allow us to do things like negotiate prices with major mailers or
control our own wages. Too often, those decisions are left to a third party to decide. That is no way
to run a business - and as a business is how we want to be seen.
But the way the rules are set up now, we don't have the flexibility to grow our business or find new
sources of revenue. Every time we try to add, improve, or redesign products and services, some
special interest group somewhere jumps out to stop us. Think about trying to run your own business
under those circumstances! In the end, the public is not served, our local Post Offices can't adapt,
and our customers suffer as a result.
Some of these things we can fix. But, we can't do it alone. We need the help of Congress and policymakers. They need to agree on the right business model for the Postal Service, or else a national
asset will fail.
Who will be hurt? Every single person in this great nation. Americans stand to lose a basic government service: universal mail delivery. That's what our 300,000 letter carriers provide to almost
140 million addresses, 6 days a week. This service is the envy of every other postal organization in
the world - because it is the best service in the world.
Just as important, the loss of universal mail delivery would hurt the economy. Nine million people
in America work in the mailing industry - that's a $900 billion industry - many of them right here in
[CITY] would be affected as well.
We can't let that happen. We must transform ourselves to meet the challenges of the 21st century
marketplace.
That is why the postmaster general is recommending that the U.S. Postal Service become a Commercial Government Enterprise. This change would allow the Postal Service to run more like a business, while protecting our core mission of delivering the mail to every address in every community in
America. But it is also a model that is very different from what we have today.
For example, instead of breaking even, our financial goal would be to generate "reasonable returns." Earnings would pay for new buildings, equipment, and capital projects instead of our having
to resort to running up our debt. Retained earnings - a rainy day account, essentially - would
carry us through tough economic times, so we wouldn't have to raise the price of stamps all the time.
We'd also be able to use our vast retail and delivery assets to generate new revenue. Think about
it - we have more than 30,000 retail offices and a national door-to-door delivery network. If we
could offer that sort of local access to private companies as a joint profit-making venture, it would be
a win-win situation for everyone - local postal outlets would be able to generate additional revenue
and customers, and our private sector partners would have a stronger presence in the community.
And, we could introduce flexible pricing. Prices for postal products would still be subject to regulatory review. But we would have the flexibility to adjust prices based on demand - like businesses do
every day.
Next, as a labor intensive organization, with 75 percent of our operating expenses going to labor,
it is important that we find ways to manage this part of our budget. Well, this business model would
allow us to find more progressive ways to make collective bargaining work for all parties. Let's face
it, our current system is expensive and time-consuming - neither side wins.
Finally and most importantly, this model would give us the flexibility to increase access and convenience to our customers - our whole reason for being. We would be able to add more locations with
longer hours, invest in new facilities and services, and enter into alliances and ventures with related
private sector companies, and we'll make sure these are the right alliances, done the right way.
But we would be run like a business, so if necessary, management would have the flexibility to
close nonperforming retail outlets, while we look at better ways to make our services accessible to
everyone in America.
Essentially, this "commercialized Postal Service" would give us the management tools that are
available to private corporations to improve service to our customers, manage costs more efficiently,
and leverage our assets to generate new revenue opportunities.
To that point, the postmaster general has said that he is willing to tackle the difficult issues head-
on, by lifting self-imposed restraints and setting the stage for making this transformation a success.
We have already started this process. First, the postmaster general announced in early April that
we are lifting the moratorium that management put in place 4 years ago on closing small Post
Offices.
Does that mean there will be wholesale closings? No. It does mean we will restart the process to
close those Post Offices that have been "suspended" or effectively closed - in some cases for 10
years or more. In most of those places we have already provided alternative services that have actually improved customer access to postal products.
Let me reassure you, we remain committed to increasing customer access for underserved cities
and towns across the country. After all, improved access is what our customers want, and it is what
they deserve.
(PAUSE)
There are a number of things we are doing right now to start the transformation process.
For example, we are taking a long, hard look at our processing network. With our automated environment and changes in our mail mix, we no longer need some of the 400 processing centers we
have nationwide. We can save money through consolidation and we can strengthen the network -
and, more importantly, we can improve service.
We also intend to get even more aggressive in taking advantage of our size and buying ability to
lower our costs for office supplies, equipment, and fuel.
We must find a way to reduce the $300 million a year we spend on labor-management disagreements. By reducing workplace disputes and finding better ways to resolve them, we can focus better
on serving our customers more efficiently.
Industry leaders around the country have already told us that they recognize our need to transform ourselves and have pledged to continue to work closely with us. We want to build on this good
will.
And, as you may have heard, the postmaster general has already committed to maintain the new
postage rates approved by the Board of Governors until at least calendar year 2004. Remember, we
hadn't planned on these increases. The last year was a particularly difficult one for us - and all
Americans. We were not immune to the economic changes that hit every American industry, and we
experienced the additional double-hit of September 11th and the anthrax attacks on top of an already weak economy. The result: We needed additional revenue, and we needed it quickly, to keep
our systems up and running.
Even before the attacks, we had already tightened our fiscal belt. We are completing 3 straight
years of productivity gains, despite a softening of our revenue base.
Internally, we have been sharing best practices and deploying uniform standards throughout the
country. And we will continue to invest in equipment to improve productivity.
Over the past 2 years, our productivity efforts have saved $2.5 billion, and we have ambitious
plans to save an additional $5 billion between now and 2006. Has it ever been done? No! Does it
have to be done? Yes.
We pledge to do our part. We pledge to continue our strong performance focus. We pledge to
make those sensible changes that are possible within the framework of existing legislation, and we
pledge to work with the Administration and Congress to bring about legislative reform to achieve this
transformation.
And most of all, we pledge to continue working closely with you, with our employees at every level, and with the entire nation to ensure that our transformation best meets your needs, and the
needs of the American people.
We are part of an industry that contributes $900 billion dollars to our economy each year. It's an
industry that employs 9 million people. And, it's an industry that represents 9 percent of our gross
domestic product.
It's an industry that works hard to build prosperity - community by community. It's an industry
whose backbone is the thousands and thousands of local mailers in cities and towns all across
America.
Ultimately, it's an industry that understands that its success is also based on the ability of the
Postal Service to take each of 38,000 individual, community-based Post Offices - and knit them
into a seamless network - and a real business, with the ability to reach everyone, everywhere,
virtually every day - and to do it affordably.
We understand the value of universal service and - now more than ever - the special trust the
American people place in the sanctity of the mail. This plan for transformation is a key step in moving past our limitations, to secure the future of universal mail service for our children and their
children.
Working together, we can continue to connect our people, our neighborhoods - indeed the whole
nation as no one else can - just as we have for more than 225 years. I look forward to working with
each and every one of you to achieve this goal.
Thank you.
- end -
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: [INSERT YOUR NAME]
[INSERT DATE] [INSERT YOUR PHONE NUMBER]
Internet: www.usps.com
Postal Service Transformation Plan Will Protect Universal Service:
[POST OFFICE NAME] Residents to Benefit From New Plan
[CITY, STATE] - Faced with decreasing mail volume and a sluggish economy, the Postal Service
announced details of a forward-looking Transformation Plan, proposing a new business model that
would protect the fundamental right of every American to affordable, universal mail service.
"In the short term, it will give us the flexibility to keep costs down and to better serve customers in
the [NAME] Post Office," said [POSTMASTER'S NAME]. In the long term, we are working to secure
a new business model to continue fulfilling our mandate to bind the nation together."
The new model, called a Commercial Government Enterprise (CGE), would create a government-
owned entity, but one that enjoys some of the operational and financial flexibility found in the private
sector. As a CGE, the Postal Service would set rates more predictably, be able to use earnings to
strengthen the nation's mail system, work under private sector labor laws, and, depending on future
legislation, could even pay taxes or dividends to the government.
The CGE model would be a structural transformation requiring legislative acts of Congress. The
proposed legislative changes would be the most extensive since the Postal Reorganization Act of
1970, which enabled the Postal Service to function effectively until the end of the 20th Century.
The plan also outlined short-term, cost-cutting measures. The Postal Service has already cut
30,000 jobs nationwide and reduced costs by $2.5 billion over the past 2 years. Over the next 5
years, costs will be cut by $5 billion more nationwide through job attrition, outsourcing, plant consolidation, lifting the moratorium on Post Office closings, and other measures. In addition, the Postal
Service will focus on developing new "intelligent" mail products to attract new business and better
serve existing customers.
LOCAL OP-ED TO BE RELEASED UNDER POSTMASTER'S SIGNATURE
Transforming the Postal Service
The Postal Service recently delivered its Transformation Plan to Congress. The plan is a blueprint
for the future of the Postal Service in the face of a changing mail industry, technological advances in
communications, and the current recession. Since its founding more than 225 years ago, the Postal
Service has been committed to providing every American with the fundamental right to have mail
service at affordable rates. The Transformation Plan protects that right in the 21st century.
The plan offers solutions to the current financial problems the Postal Service now faces and in the
long-term calls for a new business model to replace our 30-year-old operating structure. A new business model will require legislative changes, essentially rewriting the 1970 Postal Reorganization Act
that formed the current Postal Service.
The Postal Service gets most of its revenue from First-Class MailŪ - the kind of mail used to pay
bills, and send greeting cards and letters. Any decline in this type of mail has huge consequences,
since two-thirds of our costs are covered by the revenue it brings in. For the first time since the
Great Depression, mail volume is down. Add to that equation the [NUMBER] new addresses
created every year in the [POST OFFICE NAME] Post Office and you can see the crisis we face.
Trends like that threaten our ability to deliver the mail.
But we have solutions. For the long term, the Postal Service will ask Congress to adopt a new
business model, called a Commercial Government Enterprise (CGE). Changing to a CGE would be
a big step toward placing the Postal Service on a more business-like footing. We would be expected
to provide traditional and nontraditional products and services and implement market-based pricing.
Universal mail delivery would be maintained by giving the Postal Service the flexibility and modern
management tools to survive in a new economy.
The Postal Service delivers 46% of the world's mail. No postal system does what the U.S. Postal
Service does today. But what organization can keep the same business model for 30 years and
hope to survive?
No business could. Any organization must be able to change in order to survive. No one 30 years
ago could have predicted the rise of the Internet, electronic bill payment, and competition from global
mail providers. To meet these challenges, the Postal Service needs a new regulatory framework.
The Transformation Plan will provide that.
As postmaster for [POST OFFICE NAME], I'm excited to be a part of this Transformation Plan.
Delivering the mail is a public trust, and the Postal Service is committed to guaranteeing mail delivery well into the future. This plan is the first step in that process and sparks a public policy dialogue
with the American people.
# # #
LETTER TO LOCAL BUSINESS LEADERS
[INSERT DATE]
[INSERT NAME]
[INSERT TITLE]
[INSERT STREET ADDRESS]
[INSERT CITY, STATE, ZIP+4]
Dear [INSERT TITLE AND NAME]:
For more than 225 years, the U.S. Postal Service has served every person and every community in this
nation. The simple fact is that affordable, accessible mail service is a fundamental right for every
American.
Today, however, the Postal Service's ability to deliver on its historic mission of "binding the nation
together," is being challenged as never before. We are operating within a dramatically changing communications marketplace, but we are limited by a 32-year-old legislative charter that could not anticipate
the nature and pace of these changes.
To successfully continue providing universal service to everyone - no matter who, no matter where -
the Postal Service must undergo transformation. To help us do that, we have just completed and
provided Congress with a Transformation Plan. This historic document is a blueprint for the future of
America's mail service. This is an important subject and one I would like to discuss with you and the
members of your organization.
The Postal Service delivers money, messages, and merchandise to 138 million s and businesses
6 days a week. In providing its services, the Postal Service also serves as a cornerstone of a $900 billion
mailing industry that employs 9 million people and represents 9 percent of the gross domestic product.
Locally, the [NUMBER] employees of the [POST OFFICE NAME] Post Office collected, transported,
processed, and delivered [NUMBER] pieces of mail to [NUMBER] local addresses last year. The local
economy benefited by the [TOTAL AMOUNT] in postal employee salaries and benefits.
I look forward to hearing from you so I can share more information about what the Postal Service is doing
to preserve the right of affordable, universal mail service for every American. Thank you for your
consideration.
Sincerely,
[SIGN]
[INSERT POSTMASTER'S NAME]
Postmaster
U.S. Postal Service
[INSERT CITY, STATE, ZIP+4]
On April 4, 2002, Postmaster General Jack Potter presented Congress a Transformation Plan for the Postal Service. The plan is a blueprint for the future of the Postal
Service.
How did this plan come about?
The General Accounting Office (GAO) - the investigative arm of Congress - placed the Postal Service on its
list of high-risk government agencies in September
2001.
The GAO requested that the Postal Service, in conjunction with Congress and other stakeholders, present a
Transformation Plan that would address the issues
raised by the report. These included human capital
challenges, financial challenges, and limitations on our
ability to transform the organization by ourselves.
The plan was originally due by the end of last year, but
the Postal Service was granted an extension due to the
September 11 attacks and the anthrax crisis.
What did the GAO report say about the Postal
Service?
The report said that the Postal Service could be in danger financially unless something was done.
What kind of financial shape is the Postal Service
in?
Last fiscal year, the Postal Service lost $1.7 billion. And
that's with two rate increases!
The combination of declining mail volume, terrorist attacks, and the recession have all contributed to loss of
revenue this year.
Rate increases will help in the short term, but that is not
a strategy for long-term success. Our future security
depends on transforming. That's why this plan is so
important.
What other challenges does the Postal Service face
now?
First-Class MailŪ, our most profitable product, is a mature product. Volume is expected to decline significantly
in the next 5 to 10 years, as electronic alternatives such
as e-mail and Internet banking become more popular.
Our delivery infrastructure increases by 1.7 million addresses a year. That's like adding the city of Chicago to
our delivery network every year. The costs of necessary
network expansion are not being offset by a corresponding increase in revenue.
Competition is increasing. Many foreign Post Offices
have been privatized and now compete on a global level
right here in the United States. And our domestic competitors continue to expand and grow their businesses.
How will the Transformation Plan help the Postal
Service?
You've heard the bad news, so let me tell you the good
news. We have solutions to these challenges.
And we have the backing of the American people.
You've all experienced it after the anthrax attacks.
People coming up to you on your routes or in your neighborhood, telling you how much they appreciate the job
you do.
You know the numbers: 207 billion pieces a year go
through this system - 680 million pieces a day. No
postal system in the world does what the U.S. Postal
Service can do.
This Transformation Plan will let us do our job even better. And it will protect universal service.
We will also be able to set more predictable rates and
even offer creative discount pricing to help drive mail
volume growth. We can't do that now.
It's absolutely amazing the things postal employees do
every day, even with all the restrictions that are put on
us.
This plan will make us more efficient and allow us to do
what we do best - deliver the mail to everyone, everywhere, at affordable prices.
Affordable, accessible mail service is a fundamental
right of all Americans. We want to protect that right - as
we have for the last 225 years.
Will there be employee layoffs?
I know what you're thinking. When they say "more efficient," and talk about closing Post Offices and consolidating plants, they mean cutting jobs. That's not what
this plan is about.
It's true that if we continue down the same path that
we're on today, especially with the declining growth of
mail volume, there could be layoffs. But, one of the
greatest concerns we have at the Postal Service is losing employees to retirement - and to other government
agencies. And we're committed to recruiting and retaining the best people.
We're working to build a performance-based culture -
one that rewards you for your accomplishments.
This plan is about giving people the tools to do their job
better.
Why does the Postal Service need Congress' help to
do any of these things?
There are some things we can do on our own, right now.
But if we really want to change, the law must also
change to give us the tools we need to succeed in a new
business environment.
The basic legislation that governs the Postal Service
was enacted in 1970. A lot has changed in 32 years.
We have the Internet, electronic banking, e-mail, and
who knows what else coming down the road. Each of
those threatens our mail volume and our revenue.
We need a business model that will let us succeed today
and build a stronger future.
The good news is that many members of Congress understand our financial condition and the challenges we
are facing. And they know how important the mail is to
this nation.
What can employees do to help the Postal Service
transform itself?
The best thing you can do to help is continue providing
the best service possible to our customers.
Continue to sell Postal Service products and services.
Share information with your family, friends, neighbors,
and communities about why we need to change.
Discuss transformation with your coworkers, and learn
all you can about it.
If you want more information, read the Transformation
Plan. It's on the intranet at http://blue.usps.gov and on
the web at www.usps.com.
Area Public Affairs and Communications
Managers
Ralph Stewart
Manager, Public Affairs and Communications
Eastern Area/U.S. Postal Service
PO Box 40593
Philadelphia, PA 19197-0593
215-931-5054
Helen Skillman and Deborah Yackley
Public Affairs and Communications
Capitol Metro/U.S. Postal Service
10320 Little Patuxent Pkwy, Ste 308
Columbia, MD 21044-5210
410-715-0070
Diane Todd
Manager, Public Affairs and Communications
NY Metro Area/U.S. Postal Service
421 Eighth Ave., Rm. 5114
New York, NY 10199-9681
212-330-3118
Debra Hawkins
Manager, Public Affairs and Communications
Northeast Area/U.S. Postal Service
6 Griffin Rd N
Windsor, CT 06006-9876
860-285-7265
Earl C. Artis, Jr.
Manager, Public Affairs and Communications
Southeast Area/U.S. Postal Service
225 North Humphrey Blvd
Memphis, TN 38166-0832
901-747-7544
Jim Mruk
Manager, Public Affairs and Communications
Great Lakes Area/U.S. Postal Service
244 Knollwood Dr, 4th Floor
Bloomingdale, IL 60117-2208
630-539-6565
Dan De Miglio
Manager, Public Affairs and Communications
Pacific Area/U.S. Postal Service
390 Main Street, Ste 200
San Francisco, CA 94105-8000
415-536-6490
David Mazer
Manager, Public Affairs and Communications
Pacific Area/U.S. Postal Service
7001 S Central Ave, Room 364A
Los Angeles, CA 90052-9641
323-586-1212
Cesta Ayers, Jr.
(A) Manager, Public Affairs and Communications
Southwest Area/U.S. Postal Service
7800 N Stemmons Freeway, Ste 450
Dallas, TX 75247-4220
214-819-8710
Scott Budny
Manager, Public Affairs and Communications
Western Area/U.S. Postal Service
1745 Stout St, Ste 400
Denver, CO 80299-7500
303-313-5130
Government Relations Managers and Representatives
State
|
Abbr.
|
Manager
|
Telephone
|
Representative
|
Telephone
|
Alabama
|
AL
|
Thomas Sharkey
|
202-268-3746
|
Laurie Solnik
|
202-268-3743
|
Alaska
|
AK
|
Mary Ann Simpson
|
202-268-3741
|
Jennifer Alvarez
|
202-268-7839
|
American Samoa
|
AS
|
Mary Ann Simpson
|
202-268-3741
|
Jennifer Alvarez
|
202-268-7839
|
Arizona
|
AZ
|
Cathy Pagano
|
202-268-3427
|
Renee Gadson
|
202-268-7217
|
Arkansas
|
AR
|
Cathy Pagano
|
202-268-3427
|
Faith Beamon
|
202-268-3754
|
California
|
CA
|
Mary Ann Simpson
|
202-268-3741
|
Bill Weagley
|
202-268-3745
|
Connecticut
|
CT
|
Ken Currier
|
202-268-3616
|
Jo Waterman
|
202-268-6748
|
Colorado
|
CO
|
Cathy Pagano
|
202-268-3427
|
Renee Gadson
|
202-268-7217
|
Delaware
|
DE
|
Ken Currier
|
202-268-3616
|
Jo Waterman
|
202-268-6748
|
District of Columbia
|
DC
|
Mitch King
|
202-268-3740
|
Rebecca Sumner
|
202-268-3755
|
Florida
|
FL
|
Thomas Sharkey
|
202-268-3746
|
Laurie Solnik
|
202-268-3743
|
Georgia
|
GA
|
Thomas Sharkey
|
202-268-3746
|
Jim Quirk
|
202-268-8468
|
Guam
|
GU
|
Mary Ann Simpson
|
202-268-3741
|
Jennifer Alvarez
|
202-268-7839
|
Hawaii
|
HI
|
Mary Ann Simpson
|
202-268-3741
|
Jennifer Alvarez
|
202-268-7839
|
Idaho
|
ID
|
Mary Ann Simpson
|
202-268-3741
|
Jennifer Alvarez
|
202-268-7839
|
Illinois
|
IL
|
Kim Weaver
|
202-268-3429
|
Cynthia Puryear
|
202-268-3750
|
Indiana
|
IN
|
Mitch King
|
202-268-3740
|
Rebecca Sumner
|
202-268-3755
|
Iowa
|
IA
|
Kim Weaver
|
202-268-3429
|
Sheila Meyers
|
202-268-7505
|
Kansas
|
KS
|
Cathy Pagano
|
202-268-3427
|
Renee Gadson
|
202-268-7217
|
Kentucky
|
KY
|
Mitch King
|
202-268-3740
|
Pat Irons
|
202-268-3744
|
Louisiana
|
LA
|
Cathy Pagano
|
202-268-3427
|
Faith Beamon
|
202-268-3754
|
Maine
|
ME
|
Ken Currier
|
202-268-3616
|
Kathy Sitterle
|
202-268-6027
|
Maryland
|
MD
|
Mitch King
|
202-268-3740
|
Rebecca Sumner
|
202-268-3755
|
Massachusetts
|
MA
|
Ken Currier
|
202-268-3616
|
Jo Waterman
|
202-268-6748
|
Michigan
|
MI
|
Kim Weaver
|
202-268-3429
|
Cynthia Puryear
|
202-268-3750
|
Minnesota
|
MN
|
Kim Weaver
|
202-268-3429
|
Sheila Meyers
|
202-268-7505
|
Mississippi
|
MS
|
Thomas Sharkey
|
202-268-3746
|
Laurie Solnik
|
202-268-3743
|
Missouri
|
MO
|
Kim Weaver
|
202-268-3429
|
Sheila Meyers
|
202-268-7505
|
Montana
|
MT
|
Mary Ann Simpson
|
202-268-3741
|
Jennifer Alvarez
|
202-268-7839
|
Nebraska
|
NE
|
Kim Weaver
|
202-268-3429
|
Sheila Meyers
|
202-268-7505
|
Nevada
|
NV
|
Mary Ann Simpson
|
202-268-3741
|
Jennifer Alvarez
|
202-268-7839
|
New Hampshire
|
NH
|
Ken Currier
|
202-268-3616
|
Jo Waterman
|
202-268-6748
|
New Jersey
|
NJ
|
Ken Currier
|
202-268-3616
|
Jo Waterman
|
202-268-6748
|
New Mexico
|
NM
|
Cathy Pagano
|
202-268-3427
|
Renee Gadson
|
202-268-7217
|
New York
|
NY
|
Ken Currier
|
202-268-3616
|
Kathy Sitterle
|
202-268-6027
|
North Carolina
|
NC
|
Thomas Sharkey
|
202-268-3746
|
Jim Quirk
|
202-268-8468
|
North Dakota
|
ND
|
Kim Weaver
|
202-268-3429
|
Sheila Meyers
|
202-268-7505
|
Ohio
|
OH
|
Mitch King
|
202-268-3740
|
Pat Irons
|
202-268-3744
|
Oklahoma
|
OK
|
Cathy Pagano
|
202-268-3427
|
Faith Beamon
|
202-268-3754
|
Oregon
|
OR
|
Mary Ann Simpson
|
202-268-3741
|
Jennifer Alvarez
|
202-268-7839
|
Pennsylvania
|
PA
|
Mitch King
|
202-268-3740
|
Rebecca Sumner
|
202-268-3755
|
Puerto Rico
|
PR
|
Ken Currier
|
202-268-3616
|
Kathy Sitterle
|
202-268-6027
|
Rhode Island
|
RI
|
Ken Currier
|
202-268-3616
|
Jo Waterman
|
202-268-6748
|
South Carolina
|
SC
|
Thomas Sharkey
|
202-268-3746
|
Jim Quirk
|
202-268-8468
|
South Dakota
|
SD
|
Kim Weaver
|
202-268-3429
|
Sheila Meyers
|
202-268-7505
|
Tennessee
|
TN
|
Thomas Sharkey
|
202-268-3746
|
Jim Quirk
|
202-268-8468
|
Texas
|
TX
|
Cathy Pagano
|
202-268-3427
|
Faith Beamon
|
202-268-3754
|
Utah
|
UT
|
Cathy Pagano
|
202-268-3427
|
Renee Gadson
|
202-268-7217
|
Vermont
|
VT
|
Ken Currier
|
202-268-3616
|
Kathy Sitterle
|
202-268-6027
|
Virgin Islands
|
VI
|
Ken Currier
|
202-268-3616
|
Kathy Sitterle
|
202-268-6027
|
Virginia
|
VA
|
Mitch King
|
202-268-3740
|
Pat Irons
|
202-268-3744
|
Washington
|
WA
|
Mary Ann Simpson
|
202-268-3741
|
Jennifer Alvarez
|
202-268-7839
|
West Virginia
|
WV
|
Mitch King
|
202-268-3740
|
Pat Irons
|
202-268-3744
|
Wisconsin
|
WI
|
Kim Weaver
|
202-268-3429
|
Cynthia Puryear
|
202-268-3750
|
Wyoming
|
WY
|
Cathy Pagano
|
202-268-3427
|
Renee Gadson
|
202-268-7217
|
- Public Affairs and Communications, 4-18-02
|